This Be The Verse
They fuck you up, your mum and dad.
They may not mean to, but they do.
They fill you with the faults they had
And add some extra, just for you.
But they were fucked up in their turn
By fools in old-style hats and coats,
Who half the time were soppy-stern
And half at one another’s throats.
Man hands on misery to man.
It deepens like a coastal shelf.
Get out as early as you can,
And don’t have any kids yourself.
BY PHILIP LARKIN
Bugünü Yaşama Arzusu
#Schopenhauer
*Yazar
#Aldığımız her nefes bizi sürekli etkisi altında olduğumuz ölüme doğru çeker... Nihal olarak zafer ölümün olacaktır, çünkü doğumla birlikte ölüm zaten bizim kaderimiz olmuştur ve avını yutmadan önce onunla yalnızca kısa bir süre için oynar. Bununla birlikte, hayatımıza olabildiğince uzun bir süre için büyük bir ilgi ve
Go tell all of your girlfriends
That I was just a waste of time
You know you kinda like it
Every time I catch your eye
Don't tell me you don't want me
'Cause I know it's a lie, lie, lie, lie
Oh boy, I can't keep holding on this
And I don't plan on falling for your tricks
But before you go, it's only right I let you know
I heard your song playing out loud tonight
I rang but it fell by the wayside
At quarter past three
It seemed like a good idea to me
And you call, so I answer
And you're mad, but there's laughter
Could we live, ever after?
Yapay Zekâ Sorumluluğu üzerine Master tezi - pdf indirme linki
philpapers.org/archive/DEMRIA-...
Sorumluluk İçselliği ve Yapay Zeka Sorumluluğu
I argue for responsibility internalism. That is, moral responsibility (i.e., accountability, or being apt for praise or blame) depends only on factors internal to agents. Employing this view, I also argue that no one is responsible for what AI does but this isn’t morally problematic in a way that counts against developing or using AI. Responsibility is grounded in three potential conditions: the control (or freedom) condition, the epistemic (or awareness) condition, and the causal responsibility condition (or consequences). I argue that causal responsibility is irrelevant for moral responsibility, and that the control condition and the epistemic condition depend only on factors internal to agents. Moreover, since what AI does is at best a consequence of our actions, and the consequences of our actions are irrelevant to our responsibility, no one is responsible for what AI does. That is, the so-called responsibility gap exits. However, this isn’t morally worrisome for developing or using AI. Firstly, I argue, current AI doesn’t generate a new kind of concern about responsibility that the older technologies don’t. Then, I argue that responsibility gap is not worrisome because neither responsibility gap, nor my argument for its existence, entails that no one can be justly punished, held accountable, or incurs duties in reparations when AI causes a harm.
I would let him, in anyway...
Once they are alone and everyone else leaves he leans over the desk and looks down at her and is eye level with her
"How come you don't see what all the other girls see in me?"
he asks in a teasing manner and leans closer slightly while he smiles at her. she chuckles under her breath
"I see what they see."
she looks up and down to his body then looks up to his eyes
"But I'm not a weak-willed woman. I don't jump on a man just because he's handsome."
he chuckles.
"And what happens when that man is not just handsome but also strong and smart and independent and dominant and he knows how to take complete control over a beautiful woman like you."
he stares at her while his eyes are still hot and he starts to move in closer.
"*Would you let him have his way over you or would you be too stubborn to submit*"
Examined Life
We should develop I think a much more terrifying new abstract materialism, kind of a mathematical universe where there is nothing, there are just formulas, technical forms and so on, and the difficult thing is to find poetry, spirituality in this dimension. To recreate if not beauty then aesthetic dimension in things like this -in trash itself- that's the true love of the world. Because, what is love? Love is not idealization. Every true lover knows that if you really love a woman or a man, that you don't idealize him or her. Love means that you accept a person with all its failures, stupidities, ugly points... and nontheless the person's absolute for you, anything that makes life worth living. But you see perfection in imperfection itself. And that's how we should learn to love the world. True ecologists love all this.
You know you're on my mind?
And if the world don't break
I'll be shaking it
'Cause I'm a young man after all
And when the seasons change
Will you stand by me?
'Cause I'm a young man built to fall